We are in full production for Consortium: The Tower. Backers at the Consortium Initiate level can now get access to a forum with daily progress reports! Learn more here:http://interdimensionalgames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=157&t=1147

Fig Investment

Topics and posts about The Tower. Please be civil. Major trolls may be banned without notice!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Mykll
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:10 pm
Location: Davidian Bunker
Flag: United States of America

Fig Investment

#1 Post by Mykll » Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:39 pm

Ok so we all know that the investment paperwork and all that will take time, and only when that gets approved, will people start to get charged for their investment thing. And that there were I believe 2 different types of investments, the small personal investment and the big dollar ones. Correct me if I have any of that wrong.

So my questions are what happens after the paperwork gets approved, and iDGi can start to charge people.

Will both sets of investments (small personal and big) get charged at the same time, or will the big stuff gets processed first, and then any small personal ones to follow?

What kind of heads up will we be given that we are about to get charged?

heels_FIGq
Consortium Officer
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:31 pm
Flag: United States of America

Re: Fig Investment

#2 Post by heels_FIGq » Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:49 pm

Hey Mykll,

It's not an automatic charge - When we're ready to collect for Consortium: The Tower we'll reach out backers and instruct them on where to go at Fig in order to complete their investment. You'll have plenty of time and advance warning to get it all sorted.

User avatar
Mykll
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:10 pm
Location: Davidian Bunker
Flag: United States of America

Re: Fig Investment

#3 Post by Mykll » Fri Sep 30, 2016 5:21 am

So I got an e-mail from Fig saying that the SEC filings have been done. Specifically...

"Fig Game Shares - PSY2 for Psychonauts 2 has just been qualified by the SEC! If you reserved an investment, we’ll be in touch next week on how to complete the purchase of your shares."

Does that mean a filing for each game will have to be done separately?

Also, here is the investment info for Make Sail:

Image

And here is the preview investment for Wasteland 3:

Image

For The Tower it wasn't quite spelled out like this, plus the minimum amount was $250, and there was no mention (that I remember) about buying units, just a minimum amount and pick your amount. So now some of our (well okay maybe only 2 people?) concerns are that will the seemingly $1,000 minimum amount be enforced for The Tower, and will Units be enforced as well? Buying Units is much different than "Minimum amount, pick your amount".

User avatar
Mykll
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:10 pm
Location: Davidian Bunker
Flag: United States of America

Re: Fig Investment

#4 Post by Mykll » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:22 am

Any update on the Fig investment side of things? It is a little concerning seeing Wasteland 3 already open for investment, and seems to be past the initial paperwork hurdle that The Tower finds themselves in. iDGi only got Pledges of $98,788. And out of that, 100% is never received (historically with KS projects anyway, like bad credit cards, or who knows why a pledge doesn't get collected). I dunno about the cost of living up there, but that is very little money to split however many ways for 11 months since the Fig project ended. Greg and company can really use the additional funds on the investment side of things, $249,750. I would say much more than inXile needed their investment funds, and yet they were somehow able to leapfrog everyone. It concerns me a great deal that people directly tied to Fig can get their game crammed through for investment (Tim Schafer with Psychonauts 2 and Brian Fargo with Wasteland 3) and we sit here waiting for iDGi's The Tower to go through, a company, and a project, that seems to need the influx of money more. And we are sitting in the dark without being told what is going on. I don't blame Greg, I don't blame iDGi. Things seems to be real fishy over at Fig. It seems like all of those angry comments from the Kickstarter about Tim Schafer and Fig were based on something that I am only just now starting to see.

User avatar
GreatBird
Consortium Administrator
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:05 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Flag: Canada
Contact:

Re: Fig Investment

#5 Post by GreatBird » Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:54 pm

The short answer, Mykll, is have no fear - Fig has our backs. They've been supporting us with their own funds due to the extreme reservation collecting delays, so from our point of view everything is on track as originally planned.

It has indeed been a long road to opening the unaccredited investment for The Tower and the reason has something to do with the overall amount of money we reserved for investment, compared to the multi-million dollar campaigns. I'm no lawyer but there is an army of lawyers and S.E.C. officials behind this whole new type of investment, so I'm no expert!

I'm betting the Fig guys will make a post here at some point soon to update you all on the path timeline...

We at iDGi have been and remain hyper focussed on getting this here complicated videogame done for y'all. ;-)
Do, or do not. There is no try.

-- GreatBird --

User avatar
FordGT90Concept
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:36 pm
Location: IA
Flag: United States of America

Re: Fig Investment

#6 Post by FordGT90Concept » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:10 pm

That's great to hear that Fig is helping you out until they solve their legal problems. Sad, and perhaps disrespectful, that Fig hasn't kept pledgers in the loop about these hurdles.
212121212121212121212121212121212121212121

User avatar
Mykll
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:10 pm
Location: Davidian Bunker
Flag: United States of America

Re: Fig Investment

#7 Post by Mykll » Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:06 pm

Thanks for the response GreatBird. I just worry about you guys. I know the $300,000 goal wasn't even the full amount needed, and all I could see is that for almost a year all you got was maybe $90,000 for the entire team. And then other large products, so far two with direct ties to Fig, were able to get through the system. This is not like KS where I have a big history of knowing delays, ok with no updates for a few months, etc. This is a different platform with a different crowdfunding type system, so it seems without a lot more history or Fig being a lot more open, things haven't seemed right. Like unfortunately The Tower was too early to have any form of "Slacker Backer" treatment. Or so it seems.

Well I guess as long as Fig is supporting iDGi, and the team can still pay their bills and eat more than Ramen noodles, and everyone can take care of their growing families, then I will try to not worry about things too much. With such a new platform I would have hoped Fig would be more open.

User avatar
GreatBird
Consortium Administrator
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:05 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Flag: Canada
Contact:

Re: Fig Investment

#8 Post by GreatBird » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:13 pm

We really, deeply appreciate your concerns about our wellbeing. Truly!! :D

However, in the grand scheme of things, things really are going according to plans put down in early 2016. Game is coming together like a massive jigsaw puzzle, at this point. :)
Do, or do not. There is no try.

-- GreatBird --

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dkamouflage, fanatictentacle and 5 guests