We are in full production for Consortium: The Tower. Backers at the Consortium Initiate level can now get access to a forum with daily progress reports! Learn more here:http://interdimensionalgames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=157&t=1147

Still reaching for stretch goals?

Topics and posts about The Tower. Please be civil. Major trolls may be banned without notice!
Post Reply
User avatar
FordGT90Concept
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:36 pm
Location: IA
Flag: United States of America

Still reaching for stretch goals?

Post by FordGT90Concept » Sun Aug 07, 2016 8:58 pm

The Fig campaign got really close to reaching the "Expanded Simulation" stretch goal. Is that still a possibility if PayPal payments put you over $350,000 USD?

Since moving the goal post in production is a bad idea, could new DLC stretch goals be set up for those purchasing through PayPal? Star Citizen's massive success largely came from continued stretch goals over the original Kickstarter campaign.
212121212121212121212121212121212121212121

User avatar
GreatBird
Consortium Administrator
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:05 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Flag: Canada
Contact:

Re: Still reaching for stretch goals?

Post by GreatBird » Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:51 pm

Ford, this is certainly a good and valid question.

The answer is a little complicated. The Fig total includes most of the PayPal money received, but not quite all, given a few more backers have come onboard over the past couple months. However, we're still technically JUST below the stretch goal amount.

In general we detected a rather cold response to the stretch goal in general. We're not too surprised, largely because The Tower is shaping up to be quite a different game from CONSORTIUM despite it sharing so many mechanics, characters and obviously it being a direct continuation of the narrative. WE know that something like the Engineering System would greatly benefit The Tower, so we're moving forward with a version of it. It may not be exactly as described in the stretch goal and we won't be releasing details of what we're actually doing until much later, but there you have it.

Regarding the idea of continuing trying to crowdfund additional content/features: essentially, we just don't have the manpower to do this. Running campaigns takes a lot of manpower and time, neither of which we can spare right now with our focus being so intensely centered on producing Consortium: The Tower.

That being said - we still accept pledges and will continue to do so for the next little while, but at this point said pledges will simply go directly to helping us pay for the core production of the game, where every penny counts...
Do, or do not. There is no try.

-- GreatBird --

User avatar
FordGT90Concept
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:36 pm
Location: IA
Flag: United States of America

Re: Still reaching for stretch goals?

Post by FordGT90Concept » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:44 pm

So Expanded Simulation is off the table and Engineering System, to some extent, replaced it?

If there was a large influx of PayPal purchases at this point, nothing major would change from what is planned now?
212121212121212121212121212121212121212121

User avatar
Mykll
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:10 pm
Location: Davidian Bunker
Flag: United States of America

Re: Still reaching for stretch goals?

Post by Mykll » Tue Aug 09, 2016 7:08 am

Too bad a huge influx of recent funds doesn't count towards any stretch goals. On the other hand, depending on stretch goals (and they didn't seem SIMPLE) you have to cut off the time to achieve them at some point, to give time to plan them and implement them in game. Like you wouldn't want to hit a stretch goal through PayPal 1 week before release.

User avatar
GreatBird
Consortium Administrator
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:05 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Flag: Canada
Contact:

Re: Still reaching for stretch goals?

Post by GreatBird » Tue Aug 09, 2016 2:45 pm

Well, we are aiming to get the game as polished as possible before release to correct the mistake we made making Game One. So, this means cutting back the number of sheer features and focussing on polishing, balancing and iterating on a finished set of features for as long as possible. The longer we are able to do this, the better the resulting game will be.
Do, or do not. There is no try.

-- GreatBird --

User avatar
fanatictentacle
Consortium Officer
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 9:26 am
Location: Germany
Flag: Germany

Re: Still reaching for stretch goals?

Post by fanatictentacle » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:31 am

GreatBird wrote:Well, we are aiming to get the game as polished as possible before release to correct the mistake we made making Game One.
That would be great. It was too sad that Game One got so many bad reviews because of bugs. I think if you launch the game nearly bug-free and try your best to gain media attention, this could jumpstart sales. I mean there definitely is a marked for games like these, I heard that demand often enough. So when the time is ready I will try to boost attention in my country ;) (teh germans do like teh roll play xD )

User avatar
GreatBird
Consortium Administrator
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:05 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Flag: Canada
Contact:

Re: Still reaching for stretch goals?

Post by GreatBird » Wed Aug 17, 2016 1:19 pm

Right on fanatictentacle!! We're aiming to apply everything we learned from making the first game, and that's a LOT of stuff.
Do, or do not. There is no try.

-- GreatBird --

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: timepieces141 and 4 guests